An Ad Zombies zombie at a hospital lobby information desk, one open hand showing the way down a bright corridor
Hospital Website Design

Hospital Website Design for Find-a-Doctor, Service-Line and Price Pages

Find-a-doctor pages, service lines and price pages for hospitals. Below, a plain summary of the accessibility and advertising rules hospitals face, for your counsel to weigh. We scope every hospital build before we write a page.

A hospital website has to do three things well. Patients need to find the right doctor, service and phone number without guessing. Hospital buyers need a site they can test against a written accessibility standard. And hospitals have to post price information under a federal rule.

One 2026 request for proposals from a public hospital district says final acceptance is "contingent on validated accessibility testing." And in a 2025 survey, 33% of directory users found outdated or incorrect information.

Below: how hospital teams choose a web vendor, the rules that bite, what we build, what it costs, and the questions teams ask. The sources for the rules and numbers are listed at the bottom. This is general information, not legal advice. Which rules apply to your hospital is a question for your counsel.

What does a hospital website have to get right?

Start with the find-a-doctor page. In a 2025 national survey, 33% of people who used a directory hit outdated or incorrect information, and 21% called their last search difficult. The survey was self-reported and did not test hospital sites, so read it as a warning sign, not a score.

The page list is already written down for some buyers. One 2026 public hospital district request for proposals asks for "Find Care" and "Providers" in the main navigation, a patient portal login in secondary navigation, English and Spanish content, and a content system that lists "No technical skill required" for editors. It also asks for SEO fields and a form builder.

General information as of October 14, 2026, not legal advice. Rules change and depend on the kind of hospital and the state. Ask your own counsel which apply to you. Ad Zombies is a marketing agency and does not give legal or regulatory advice.

Price pages are the other surface. Under federal price transparency rules, a hospital must post a machine-readable file with all items and services, and a consumer-friendly display of shoppable services. Enforcement of the 2026 requirements began April 1, 2026. Whether a given hospital's page and files meet the rule is a question for that hospital and its counsel.

We did not find a large sample of hospital requests for proposals, and we did not find research on how health systems choose web vendors. Read what follows as evidence from specific sources, not a map of the whole market.

The request for proposals is the vetting step

A written request for proposals is where a hospital sets its test. One 2026 request from a public hospital district shows what a buyer can ask for in writing. It asks for WCAG 2.2 AA, and it says accessibility "must be built into design not layered afterward." It also says final acceptance is "contingent on validated accessibility testing."

Our reading: an accessibility claim helps a buyer only if it names a standard and a test method. A vague promise will not pass the buyer's test.

The same document sets the page structure. It places "Find Care" and "Providers" in primary navigation, and "Login to Portal" in secondary navigation.

Our reading: a hospital that writes its navigation into a request will check any vendor's plan against that list. We would start a hospital plan from the buyer's own list of page families.

The request also asks for English and Spanish content and a content system that needs no technical skill from editors.

Our reading: a hospital's own staff should be able to update a directory entry or a service page without calling the vendor.

This is one request, not a survey, so do not read it as the rule for every hospital.

Directories are where trust breaks

People who look for a doctor use several routes. A 2025 survey by LexisNexis Risk Solutions with Ipsos asked 3,014 U.S. adults about provider directories. Fieldwork ran June 12 to 18, 2025, and results were published September 11, 2025.

Of directory users, 33% reported "outdated or incorrect information." Of directory users, 21% rated their last directory search as difficult: 17% said somewhat difficult and 4% said very difficult.

When people look for a new provider, the same survey found that 52% ask their current doctor for a referral, 46% ask friends or family, 31% use a hospital or health system directory, and 30% use a health plan directory. People leaned on their own doctor and the people they know more than on any directory.

Our reading: a stale directory is a trust problem before it is a usability problem. A visitor who finds a wrong phone number on a find-a-doctor page has no reason to trust the next page. The survey does not measure task success on any hospital site, so it cannot say what this costs a given hospital.

Our reading, again: the fix is a process, not a page. Someone at the hospital should own the provider data, and the site should pull from that source instead of a copy edited by hand.

Some patients ask chatbots about their health

Pew Research Center surveyed 3,488 U.S. adults from June 22 to 28, 2026, and published the results on August 25, 2026. Of U.S. adults, 34% said they have used AI chatbots for at least one of eight health and medical reasons.

Pew reports that "a quarter of Americans say they use AI chatbots to diagnose symptoms." Among people who used chatbots for health, 47% said the information was extremely or very helpful. We report these numbers. We do not suggest that patients use a chatbot for medical advice.

Our reading, not a Pew finding: a service-line page that answers "what is this, who treats it, and what happens next" in plain text is the kind of page a chatbot or a search engine can quote. Pew did not measure hospital websites. We found no independent study of which hospital sites AI tools cite, so we make no claim about that.

The answer has to sit in the page's HTML, where a reader or a machine can find it, not inside an image or a PDF.

Most people search from a phone

Pew's mobile fact sheet, published November 20, 2025, found that 91% of U.S. adults own a smartphone, and 16% are smartphone-only internet users with no home broadband.

Pew did not measure how people use hospital websites on a phone, so do not read these numbers as a hospital's mobile share.

Our reading: the find-a-doctor and price pages should work on a phone first, and they should be tested there before launch.

A hospital website sits under several rule sets at once. Some are federal, some come from the FTC, some from ad platforms, and some depend on the state. This section covers the rules we found in primary and named secondary sources, and what each means for a page. It does not cover every rule that may apply.

General information as of October 14, 2026, not legal advice. Rules change and depend on the kind of hospital and the state. Ask your own counsel which apply to you. Ad Zombies is a marketing agency and does not give legal or regulatory advice.

Price transparency is a federal posting rule

Hospitals have to post price information under a federal rule. CMS says a hospital must provide "a comprehensive machine-readable file with all items and services" and "a display of shoppable services in a consumer-friendly format." Enforcement of the 2026 requirements began April 1, 2026.

Enforcement is active. A June 2026 summary from Forvis Mazars reports that 519 hospitals received noncompliance letters between April and early June 2026. The same summary says HHS announced on June 9, 2026 that "The grace period has ended." Reports differ a little on the letter count, so the number here is Forvis's, cited to them.

Our reading: a hospital's price page is a compliance surface. We can say that the rule requires a price page. We do not audit a client's price files, and we do not know what they contain. The hospital and its counsel decide whether its page and files meet the rule.

Accessibility: we say "working toward WCAG 2.2 AA," and which rule applies is a counsel question

More than one accessibility rule can reach a hospital website, and they turn on different questions. Section 1557 turns on whether the hospital is a "recipient." Under it, a recipient must ensure that its health programs and activities provided through websites and mobile applications "comply with the requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, as interpreted consistent with title II of the ADA." Whether your hospital is a recipient is a question for your counsel.

The Section 1557 text points to Section 504. The HHS Section 504 web and mobile rule names WCAG 2.1 Levels A and AA. The HHS compliance dates moved in 2026. We do not list the new dates here. Confirm them with counsel.

The Department of Justice's Title II rule is a separate rule. It covers state and local government entities, and a county, state or district hospital can be one. As of October 14, 2026, the DOJ interim final rule, published April 20, 2026, sets compliance dates of April 26, 2027 for entities serving 50,000 people or more, and April 26, 2028 for smaller entities and special districts. WCAG 2.1 AA remains the standard. Dates in an interim final rule can move.

If your hospital is run by a county, a state or a special district, your own counsel decides which accessibility rule or rules apply (the DOJ Title II rule, the HHS Section 504 rule, or both) and which dates. Our sources do not settle which one applies to a public hospital. Do not take the later date as the one that applies to you, and do not take working toward WCAG 2.2 AA as clearing either rule. We do not advise which rule applies.

This section does not say that no accessibility rule reaches a private hospital. Ask your counsel which rules reach yours.

On our own site we say "working toward WCAG 2.2 AA" and nothing stronger. Working toward a standard is not a legal clearance, and a hospital still has to know which rule and which contract apply to it.

Patient quotes are endorsements

A patient quote on a hospital site is an endorsement under FTC rules. The FTC says "an endorsement must reflect the honest opinion of the endorser." If the hospital does not have proof that a patient's results are typical, the ad should "make clear to the audience what the generally expected results" are. Saying "results not typical" alone is not a cure.

A connection that a significant minority of people would not expect should be "disclosed clearly and conspicuously." That covers a paid testimonial and a relative or staff member who speaks well of the hospital.

This page carries no patient quotes.

Our reading: a patient story raises these FTC points, and the FTC list here is not complete. Patient privacy authorization is the hospital's to handle, with its privacy officer and counsel. State physician-advertising rules may also apply. Your counsel decides which rules reach your pages.

Reviews: fake reviews and hidden reviews are banned

The FTC's 2024 rule on consumer reviews bans fake or false reviews and testimonials, "such as AI-generated fake reviews," where the business knew or should have known they were fake. It bars buying reviews, or conditioning them on a particular sentiment, and it bars undisclosed insider reviews.

It also bars misstating that suppressed reviews represent "all or most" reviews, and misusing "unfounded or groundless legal threats." The FTC can seek civil penalties against knowing violators.

Our reading: the concern is reviews that distort what readers think of the hospital. Hiding or filtering a hospital's negative reviews is a risk even if the page never says it shows them all. A reviews widget that hides negative reviews while implying it shows all of them runs directly against the text above. Take any reviews feature to your counsel before launch.

Health benefit and safety claims need evidence

The FTC's health products guidance says claims about the health benefits or safety of health-related products require substantiation "in the form of competent and reliable scientific evidence." The guidance is written for products. Whether it reaches a given hospital claim is a question for your counsel.

Our reading: a claim about the health benefit or safety of a hospital service is the kind of claim this guidance is about.

Lead ads on Meta: what Meta's rules say

Meta's ad standards say ads "must not contain content that asserts or implies personal attributes," and that includes "physical or mental health (including medical conditions)."

The same page says lead ads on Meta "must not request health information" without "our prior written permission." Here "our" means Meta. The permission is Meta's, not the patient's. The page also says its policies "are subject to change at any time without notice."

Our reading: the lead ad rule is about lead ads on Meta. It is not a rule for a hospital's own website forms, which are the hospital's to design with its counsel. On Meta, the test is whether the ad asserts or implies that the viewer has a condition, and a lead ad should not ask for a diagnosis or a condition. Check every lead ad field against Meta's text with your counsel before launch.

What we build for hospitals

We would scope these items for a hospital build. Each one traces to a source above, and each one says what stays with the hospital.

  • Find-care and provider pages with a data process. The hospital owns the provider data, and the pages pull from that source so one change shows up everywhere. The hospital also owns the accuracy of every credential and specialty label. We do not verify them.
  • Service-line pages in plain text. We build each page to answer what the service is, who treats it, and what happens next, in text a search engine or a chatbot can read. The hospital's clinicians own all clinical content. They supply it and approve it. We build the structure and write no clinical claims.
  • A price page that links to the hospital's own price files and shows the display the hospital supplies. We build the page. The hospital's file is the hospital's, and we do not check it. The hospital and its counsel decide whether the page and files meet the rule.
  • Accessibility, working toward WCAG 2.2 AA. We say it in those words and nothing stronger. Which law applies to a hospital is for counsel.
  • Portal login in secondary navigation, a pattern one public hospital district's request for proposals uses. The page links to the hospital's patient portal. We do not build or host the portal.
  • Bilingual page structure, if the hospital needs one. One request for proposals asks for English and Spanish content, and Spanish pages get their own copy, not a machine translation. We do not say our Spanish pages meet any language-access requirement. The hospital and its counsel decide that.
  • Forms and lead ads. We build the forms the hospital approves. For lead ads on Meta, the rule is that an ad must not request health information without Meta's prior written permission, and the hospital and its counsel check every field against Meta's text.

The build runs under our Web Reanimation service. The hospital gets a fixed-price proposal after the assessment, not a list of guesses.

How much does a website cost for a hospital?

Web Reanimation projects start at $10,000. You get a fixed-price proposal after a free assessment.

Hospital proposals change with the number of provider and location pages, whether the directory data process is in scope, whether a Spanish version is in scope, and how many service-line pages the hospital needs.

What happens after you reach out

  1. Take the free Reanimation Assessment: 3 minutes, tells you exactly where your site is losing you business.
  2. Get a fixed-price proposal.
  3. We build: full audit, new architecture, all new copy, CMS setup, redirects, schema markup.
  4. Launch, plus a 90-day check-in to make sure it’s actually performing.

For a hospital, the assessment also asks for the request for proposals if one exists, and for the list of page families the hospital needs.

A hospital build may add a step where the hospital's own counsel or compliance team reviews the pages before launch. That step is the hospital's own. Ad Zombies gives no legal or regulatory review.

Questions hospital teams ask

General information as of October 14, 2026, not legal advice. Rules change and depend on the kind of hospital and the state. Ask your own counsel which apply to you. Ad Zombies is a marketing agency and does not give legal or regulatory advice.

It depends on the hospital. One 2026 public hospital district request asks for WCAG 2.2 AA, says accessibility must be built in from the start, and says final acceptance is contingent on validated accessibility testing. It also asks for Find Care and Providers in the main navigation, a portal login in secondary navigation, English and Spanish content, and a content system that needs no technical skill from editors.

More than one rule can reach a hospital website. Section 1557 turns on whether the hospital is a "recipient," and it points to Section 504. A separate DOJ rule covers state and local government entities, and a county, state or district hospital can be one. These rules name WCAG 2.1 AA. As of October 14, 2026, our sources do not settle whether the DOJ rule, the HHS rule or both apply to a public hospital. Your own counsel decides, including which dates apply. Do not assume the later date applies, and do not take working toward WCAG 2.2 AA as clearing either rule. Ask your own counsel which rules apply to you.

Under the federal price transparency rule, a hospital must post a machine-readable file with all items and services, and a consumer-friendly display of shoppable services. Enforcement of the 2026 requirements began April 1, 2026. We build the page that links to your files. We do not audit what the files contain, and we do not say whether your page meets the rule. Ask your own counsel which rules apply to you.

A patient quote is an endorsement under FTC rules, and it can raise other rules too. Under the FTC rules, it has to reflect the patient's honest opinion. If the results are not typical, the page should say what results are generally expected, and "results not typical" alone is not a cure. Any paid or staff connection should be disclosed clearly. The FTC list is not complete. Patient privacy authorization is the hospital's to handle, and state physician-advertising rules may also apply. This page carries no patient quotes. Ask your own counsel which rules apply to you.

No. WCAG 2.2 AA is a technical standard, not a legal clearance. The rule or contract that applies to a hospital decides which standard it has to meet, and counsel confirms that. Ask your own counsel which rules apply to you.

A hospital website build takes 90 days to 6 months. More pages, a bilingual site, or a review step by the hospital's own counsel can add time.

Ad Zombies is a branding, advertising, and marketing company founded by Ken “Spanky” Moskowitz: 40 years in advertising, 10 Super Bowl ads, $460 billion in client revenue generated.

Thinking About a New Hospital Website?

Start with the free assessment. It takes three minutes, and it never asks for a credit card. It is a marketing check. It is not an accessibility, legal or compliance review.

Other industries we build for

  • Plastic surgery website design

    A surgery patient digs into credentials, before and afters, and procedure detail harder than almost any buyer online. Your site has to answer all of it.

  • Law firm website design

    Compliance-aware copy, real pricing, and practice-area pages that actually differ from each other. Written to hold up under your state bar’s rules, not just Google’s.

See all industries we build for

Sources

Rules and sources last checked October 2026. General information as of October 14, 2026, not legal advice. Rules change and depend on the kind of hospital and the state. Ask your own counsel which apply to you. Ad Zombies is a marketing agency and does not give legal or regulatory advice.